Peer Review Process

Beberapa kebijakan dalam tinjauan KHIDMAT ALMUJTAMI : JURNAL PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT

1. Reviewer akan mereview artikel yang dikirimkan mengikuti pedoman dan template jurnal yang disediakan.
2. Proses review dalam jurnal ini menggunakan double-blind review, yang artinya identitas reviewer dan penulis dirahasiakan dari reviewer, begitu pula sebaliknya.
3. Dalam proses review, reviewer memastikan kualitas artikel dari judul, abstrak, pembahasan dan kesimpulannya. Selain itu, reviewer juga membahas kebaruan dan kontribusinya pada diskusi ilmiah dan memverifikasi plagiarisme dan etika publikasi.
4. Resensi juga memberikan umpan balik apakah artikel diterima, ditolak atau perlu revisi.

--------------------------------------------

Several Policies under the Review Process of KHIDMAT ALMUJTAMI: Journal of Community Service

  1. Reviewers review submitted manuscripts in accordance with the journal guidelines and templates provided.

  2. The review process in this journal adopts a double-blind review, meaning that the identities of both reviewers and authors are concealed from each other.

  3. During the review process, reviewers assess the quality of the manuscript based on its title, abstract, discussion, and conclusion. In addition, reviewers evaluate the novelty and contribution of the manuscript to scholarly discussion and verify issues related to plagiarism and publication ethics.

  4. Reviewers also provide feedback and recommendations on whether the manuscript is accepted, rejected, or requires revision.